16/11/2017

The Vatican II Church and Martin Luther

So, it is logical and perfectly coherent with its own false principles that the Vatican II Church celebrates the great disgrace that overcame Christendom because of the apostate Martin Luther.

Translation: Contributor Patricia Ferreira
It is perfectly understandable that there are so many traditional Catholics stunned with the celebrations of the 5th centenary of the Lutheran Revolution. Indeed, it is painful to watch the Vicar of Christ on Earth, the successor of Peter, heading and encouraging a dithyramb of the disgusting heresiarch.
To me, personally, almost 56 years old and having lived similar scenes during the time of John Paul II, it doesn’t cause me such a surprise to see the hierarchy excited with all that. What makes me even more revolted is seeing our old churches, those gothic and baroque jewels, sacred and blessed places, rich of meaning to true Catholics, seeing those churches housing ecumenical orgies promoted by modernists heretics and Lutherans joint in the persecution against Catholics, as seen in the expulsion of young Belgians who prayed the Rosary in reparation against the profanation of a cathedral kidnapped for a bizarre ecumenical modernist Lutheran ceremony.
However, it must be said that it is equally understandable that the Church of Vatican II celebrates the 5th centenary of the nefarious work of Martin Luther. After all, without Luther and his revolution, with all its consequences, one cannot explain the Second Vatican Council, its various documents and its many reforms that poured from it.
Indeed, the new conciliar ecclesiology (in contradiction with Leo XIII’s Satis Cognitum, and Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis), as it’s shown in Lumen Gentium, with the famous expression “the Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church” is protestant in its source. It is proven and documented that this horrible expression, of which the only objective is to blear the perfect identity of the Church of Christ with the Catholic Church, was introduced by dr. Ratzinger, per suggestion of a protestant pastor.
Furthermore, let us recall the disastrous history of the liturgical reform. The writer Jean Guiton, friends with Paul VI, declared that this pope told him he had the intention of making a liturgical reform that would abolish all elements that would be unpleasant to the “separated brethren”. That’s why, after the council had ended, he invited protestant “experts” to participate in the commission in charge of the reform of the Roman Missal. From this, an ambivalent liturgy followed. And today there is no one in his right critical mind who will not recognize that the modern mass, as it is celebrated in most parishes and so appreciated by renewed Catholics, this mass is not but a mockery of a protestant cult.
Let us also recall that the new exegeses, another sour fruit of Lutheranism, which threw to the sewer our venerable Vulgate, with the classical translations by Father Antonio Pereira de Figueiredo and by Father Matos Soares, this new exegeses which introduced rationalism and free exam in the Church and is taught in almost all universities and seminaries, this new exegeses promoted a pedantic “Biblism” among reformed Catholics, so that today one only finds Catholics ignorant of the Catechism but doctors in “biblical sciences”.
Let us take into consideration that today, in the Church, one lives a new moral, the situational moral, the “discernment” moral preconized by the exhortation Amoris Laetitia. Now, this new moral of the “concrete cases” that hates abstracts principles, this false moral that considers concupiscence indomitable, this moral has a Lutheran origin as well.
Finally, all the openness of the Vatican II Church to the modern world and to the lay state (considered as an ideal regime by the declaration Dignitatis Humanae), all the excitement of the post conciliar Church with the modern democracy based on the individualism and on the universal suffrage, none of this can be explained if one does not remember that individualism is the natural corollary of the false religious reform of the XVI century.
So, it is logical and perfectly coherent with its own false principles that the Vatican II Church celebrates the great disgrace that overcame Christendom because of the apostate Martin Luther. The person who likes the modern world, who likes democracy and universal suffrage, who likes divorce, abortion and “homosexual marriages” as rights that cannot be waived, who likes feminism and “female acolytes”, female lectors, female commentators and “female deacons”, the person who likes the new liturgy and the new ecumenical bibles, this person must be immensely grateful to the heretic Martin Luther and is so very right to celebrate the sinister date.
We traditionalists, supported by the intercession of the Queen of Victories, destroyer of all heresies, supported by the intercession of all saints and martyrs of the Counter Reformation, inspired by the examples of a Philip II and of a Mary Stuart of Scotland, supported by the example of Guararapes and the sermons of Father Vieira and of Bossuet, we shall continue to abhor this heresy of false reformers as Satan’s vomit. And, collaborating always with the grace of God, let us pursue our holiness by good deeds so we merit the heavenly glory.    
Anápolis, 10/31/2017.
Rev. Father João Batista de A. Prado Ferraz Costa

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário

Antes de postar seu comentário sobre a postagem, leia: Todo comentário é moderado e deverá ter o nome do comentador. Comentário que não tenha a identificação do autor (anônimo), ou sua origem via link e ainda que não tenha o nome do emitente no corpo do texto, bem como qualquer tipo de identificação, poderá ser publicado se julgar pertinente o assunto. Como também poderá não ser publicado, mesmo com as identificações acima tratadas, caso o assunto for julga impertinente ou irrelevante ao assunto. Todo e qualquer comentário só será publicado se não ferir nenhuma das diretrizes do blog, o qual reserva o direito de publicar ou não qualquer comentário, bem como de excluí-los futuramente. Comentários ofensivos contra a Santa Madre Igreja não serão aceitos. Comentários de hereges, de pessoas que se dizem ateus, infiéis, de comunistas só serão aceitos se estiverem buscando a conversão e a fuga do erro. De indivíduos que defendem doutrinas contra a Verdade revelada, contra a moral católica, de apoio a grupos ou ideias que contrários aos ensinamentos da Igreja, ao catecismo do Concílio de Trento, ferem, denigrem, agridem, cometem sacrilégios a Deus Pai, Deus Filho, Deus Espírito Santo, a Mãe de Deus, seus Anjos, Santos, ao Papa, ao clero, as instituições católicas, a Tradição da Igreja, também não serão aceitos. Apoio a indivíduos contrários a tudo isso, incluindo ao clero modernista, só será publicado se tiver uma coerência e não for qualificado como ofensivo, propagador do modernismo, do sedevacantismo, do protestantismo, das ideologias socialistas, comunistas e modernistas, da maçonaria e do maçonismo, bem como qualquer outro tópico julgado impróprio, inoportuno, imoral, etc. Alguns comentários podem ser respondidos via e-mail, postagem de resposta no blog, resposta do próprio comentário ou simplesmente não respondido. Reservo o direito de publicar, não publicar e excluir os comentários que julgar pertinente. Para mensagens particulares, dúvidas, sugestões, inclusive de publicações, elogios e reclamações, pode ser usado o quadro CONTATO no corpo superior do blog versão web. Obrigado! Adm do blog.