“So, it is logical and
perfectly coherent with its own false principles that the Vatican II Church
celebrates the great disgrace that overcame Christendom because of the apostate
Martin Luther.”
Translation:
Contributor Patricia Ferreira
It is
perfectly understandable that there are so many traditional Catholics stunned
with the celebrations of the 5th centenary of the Lutheran Revolution. Indeed,
it is painful to watch the Vicar of Christ on Earth, the successor of Peter,
heading and encouraging a dithyramb of the disgusting heresiarch.
To me, personally,
almost 56 years old and having lived similar scenes during the time of John
Paul II, it doesn’t cause me such a surprise to see the hierarchy excited with
all that. What makes me even more revolted is seeing our old churches, those
gothic and baroque jewels, sacred and blessed places, rich of meaning to true Catholics,
seeing those churches housing ecumenical orgies promoted by modernists heretics
and Lutherans joint in the persecution against Catholics, as seen in the
expulsion of young Belgians who prayed the Rosary in reparation against the
profanation of a cathedral kidnapped for a bizarre ecumenical modernist
Lutheran ceremony.
However,
it must be said that it is equally understandable that the Church of Vatican II
celebrates the 5th centenary of the nefarious work of Martin Luther. After all,
without Luther and his revolution, with all its consequences, one cannot
explain the Second Vatican Council, its various documents and its many reforms
that poured from it.
Indeed,
the new conciliar ecclesiology (in contradiction with Leo XIII’s Satis Cognitum, and Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis), as it’s shown in Lumen Gentium, with the famous
expression “the Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church” is protestant
in its source. It is proven and documented that this horrible expression, of
which the only objective is to blear the perfect identity of the Church of
Christ with the Catholic Church, was introduced by dr. Ratzinger, per
suggestion of a protestant pastor.
Furthermore,
let us recall the disastrous history of the liturgical reform. The writer Jean
Guiton, friends with Paul VI, declared that this pope told him he had the intention
of making a liturgical reform that would abolish all elements that would be unpleasant
to the “separated brethren”. That’s why, after the council had ended, he invited
protestant “experts” to participate in the commission in charge of the reform of
the Roman Missal. From this, an ambivalent liturgy followed. And today there is
no one in his right critical mind who will not recognize that the modern mass,
as it is celebrated in most parishes and so appreciated by renewed Catholics,
this mass is not but a mockery of a protestant cult.
Let us also
recall that the new exegeses, another sour fruit of Lutheranism, which threw to
the sewer our venerable Vulgate, with the classical translations by Father
Antonio Pereira de Figueiredo and by Father Matos Soares, this new exegeses
which introduced rationalism and free exam in the Church and is taught in
almost all universities and seminaries, this new exegeses promoted a pedantic “Biblism”
among reformed Catholics, so that today one only finds Catholics ignorant of
the Catechism but doctors in “biblical sciences”.
Let us
take into consideration that today, in the Church, one lives a new moral, the
situational moral, the “discernment” moral preconized by the exhortation Amoris Laetitia. Now, this new moral of
the “concrete cases” that hates abstracts principles, this false moral that
considers concupiscence indomitable, this moral has a Lutheran origin as well.
Finally,
all the openness of the Vatican II Church to the modern world and to the lay
state (considered as an ideal regime by the declaration Dignitatis Humanae), all the excitement of the post conciliar
Church with the modern democracy based on the individualism and on the
universal suffrage, none of this can be explained if one does not remember that
individualism is the natural corollary of the false religious reform of the XVI
century.
So, it
is logical and perfectly coherent with its own false principles that the
Vatican II Church celebrates the great disgrace that overcame Christendom
because of the apostate Martin Luther. The person who likes the modern world,
who likes democracy and universal suffrage, who likes divorce, abortion and
“homosexual marriages” as rights that cannot be waived, who likes feminism and
“female acolytes”, female lectors, female commentators and “female deacons”,
the person who likes the new liturgy and the new ecumenical bibles, this person
must be immensely grateful to the heretic Martin Luther and is so very right to
celebrate the sinister date.
We
traditionalists, supported by the intercession of the Queen of Victories,
destroyer of all heresies, supported by the intercession of all saints and
martyrs of the Counter Reformation, inspired by the examples of a Philip II and
of a Mary Stuart of Scotland, supported by the example of Guararapes and the
sermons of Father Vieira and of Bossuet, we shall continue to abhor this heresy
of false reformers as Satan’s vomit. And, collaborating always with the grace
of God, let us pursue our holiness by good deeds so we merit the heavenly
glory.
Anápolis,
10/31/2017.
Rev.
Father João Batista de A. Prado Ferraz Costa
Original article in Portuguese: http://santamariadasvitorias.org/a-igreja-do-vaticano-ii-e-martinho-lutero/
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Antes de postar seu comentário sobre a postagem, leia: Todo comentário é moderado e deverá ter o nome do comentador. Comentário que não tenha a identificação do autor (anônimo), ou sua origem via link e ainda que não tenha o nome do emitente no corpo do texto, bem como qualquer tipo de identificação, poderá ser publicado se julgar pertinente o assunto. Como também poderá não ser publicado, mesmo com as identificações acima tratadas, caso o assunto for julga impertinente ou irrelevante ao assunto. Todo e qualquer comentário só será publicado se não ferir nenhuma das diretrizes do blog, o qual reserva o direito de publicar ou não qualquer comentário, bem como de excluí-los futuramente. Comentários ofensivos contra a Santa Madre Igreja não serão aceitos. Comentários de hereges, de pessoas que se dizem ateus, infiéis, de comunistas só serão aceitos se estiverem buscando a conversão e a fuga do erro. De indivíduos que defendem doutrinas contra a Verdade revelada, contra a moral católica, de apoio a grupos ou ideias que contrários aos ensinamentos da Igreja, ao catecismo do Concílio de Trento, ferem, denigrem, agridem, cometem sacrilégios a Deus Pai, Deus Filho, Deus Espírito Santo, a Mãe de Deus, seus Anjos, Santos, ao Papa, ao clero, as instituições católicas, a Tradição da Igreja, também não serão aceitos. Apoio a indivíduos contrários a tudo isso, incluindo ao clero modernista, só será publicado se tiver uma coerência e não for qualificado como ofensivo, propagador do modernismo, do sedevacantismo, do protestantismo, das ideologias socialistas, comunistas e modernistas, da maçonaria e do maçonismo, bem como qualquer outro tópico julgado impróprio, inoportuno, imoral, etc. Alguns comentários podem ser respondidos via e-mail, postagem de resposta no blog, resposta do próprio comentário ou simplesmente não respondido. Reservo o direito de publicar, não publicar e excluir os comentários que julgar pertinente. Para mensagens particulares, dúvidas, sugestões, inclusive de publicações, elogios e reclamações, pode ser usado o quadro CONTATO no corpo superior do blog versão web. Obrigado! Adm do blog.